Dashboard/AI Hub vs. Non-Hub Wage Divergence by 2030

Wage ImpactBy 2030

AI Hub vs. Non-Hub Wage Divergence by 2030

+45%+7pp / 13mo

Confidence range: 35% to 55%

Tech and knowledge workers in AI hub cities (San Francisco, Seattle, New York, Austin) now earn 45% more than peers in non-hub metros for comparable roles. This gap has widened dramatically since 2022 as AI investment concentrates geographically. Each AI job in a hub city creates 3-5 additional local service jobs, amplifying the divergence through spatial multiplier effects. Remote work was expected to narrow this gap, but AI talent clustering is widening it.

Best estimate from NBER (Manning, Aguirre) (Verified Data & Research)

Most AI-and-jobs claims come from journalism or social media. Toggle to to see what the rigorous evidence actually says.

Filter by evidence quality

How This Prediction Has Evolved

Each data point is from a different source. Dots are color-coded by evidence tier.

Sources (12)

How Adaptable Are American Workers to AI-Induced Job Displacement?
NBER (Manning, Aguirre)Jan 21, 2026Research

6.1 million workers in AI-exposed roles lack adaptive capacity; 86% are women. Vulnerability concentrated in college towns and state capitals in Mountain West and Midwest.

Regional AI Adoption Trends: Mountain Region Leads at 42%
MoneypennyDec 10, 2025News

Mountain region leads US AI adoption at 42%, followed by Pacific at 39%. Southeast lags at 22%. Regional adoption gaps correlate with widening wage divergence.

BLS Tech vs. Non-Tech Metro Wage Analysis Q3 2025
Bureau of Labor StatisticsNov 1, 2025Institutional

AI roles median salary $157K in hub metros vs. $49,500 median for all occupations nationally. Geographic premium for AI talent continues to widen.

Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics — Metropolitan Areas 2025
Bureau of Labor StatisticsJul 1, 2025Research

Computer and mathematical occupations in San Jose-SF-Oakland MSA: $178K median. National median: $108K. Gap up from 48% to 65% since 2022.

The geography of generative AI's workforce impacts will likely differ from those of previous technologies
Brookings Metro (Muro, Methkupally, Kinder)Feb 1, 2025Research

43% of workers in San Jose could see AI shift half or more of tasks, vs only 31% in Las Vegas. High-skill metro areas most exposed — reversing prior automation patterns.

Glassdoor AI Salary Trends 2025
Glassdoor Economic ResearchJan 10, 2025Institutional

Median AI/ML salary in San Francisco reached $245K. In non-hub metros, AI salaries average $162K. The 50% gap is the widest in tech history.

The Geography of AI Jobs — Indeed Hiring Lab
Indeed Hiring LabSep 1, 2024Institutional

AI-related roles offer a 38% wage premium in top-10 tech metros vs. national average. Non-AI roles in same metros show only 12% premium.

The Spatial Distribution of AI's Labor Market Effects
NBER (Moretti, Faggio)May 15, 2024Research

Each AI job in a hub city creates 3-5 local service jobs. Non-hub cities see net job losses. The spatial multiplier amplifies geographic wage divergence.

AI and the Geography of Opportunity
Brookings InstitutionJan 20, 2024Institutional

AI adoption is concentrating economic gains in a handful of superstar cities, widening the already large metro-level wage divergence.

Geographic Analysis of AI Labor Markets
LightcastAug 15, 2023Institutional

AI engineer median salary in San Francisco: $225K. Same role in Kansas City: $155K. Gap widening as demand concentrates.

LinkedIn Economic Graph: AI Talent Concentration 2023
LinkedIn Economic GraphMar 1, 2023Institutional

60% of AI/ML job postings concentrate in 10 metro areas. AI roles in SF/Bay Area pay 35% more than identical roles in mid-tier cities.